The article isn’t the main focal point of mine

It’s actually the first comment on it. 

The article is about an ad that not so subtly implies rape, one that one of the models in it is currently filing a claim against. 

Again, my attention was drawn to the first comment, inquiring as to whether the male in the ad was filing a claim as well. He was unwillingly portrayed as a rapist. Doesn’t he have as much of a claim against the advertisers? 

I just wonder how many of the people who blew a fuse over that ad bothered to take note of the other side, the one that included the portrayal of a man as a criminal. 

Advertisements