It’s actually the first comment on it.
The article is about an ad that not so subtly implies rape, one that one of the models in it is currently filing a claim against.
Again, my attention was drawn to the first comment, inquiring as to whether the male in the ad was filing a claim as well. He was unwillingly portrayed as a rapist. Doesn’t he have as much of a claim against the advertisers?
I just wonder how many of the people who blew a fuse over that ad bothered to take note of the other side, the one that included the portrayal of a man as a criminal.